On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 20:01 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Jeremy Katz (katzj@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > While that's 30MB on disk, using bzip2 as an approximation, that would only > > > save about 3.5MB of CD space. Still may be worth doing. > > > > I've been pretty vocally opposed to removing documentation in the past. > > Because if the documentation is interesting to ship for the real case, > > then it's also interesting for being on the live images. Especially as > > they're installable. And especially as we start looking at things like > > deltarpm where having those bits on the disk to begin with matters > > But is it interesting to ship for the real case, or should it be in > a separate package? For example, I'm not sure that > /usr/share/doc/ghostscript-8.61/Humor.htm is really relevant in all cases. Or should we not ship it at all? Sticking it in a separate package just leads to the other problems of bloated metadata, etc. And that's a really _dumb_ file :-) Jeremy -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
