On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 11:59 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Matthias Clasen (mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > > - don't include groups where upstream gnome is < 50% translated > > > > - don't include fonts that are only referenced in %fonts and those groups > > > > - remove ekiga, just because it drags in so much other stuff > > > > > > > > Comments? > > > > In the past, any attempts to go to a subset of language have always met > > with strong resistance. Just kicking out some fonts/input methods, but > > leaving the "unsupported" translations in the packages may send a > > somewhat mixed message, but is probably the only thing we can do since > > noone knows how to make %_install_langs work. > > Yeah, I'm just wondering if it's worth it installing fonts for a > language that's only 10% translated in the desktop (for example.) > > > Anyway, if we go with this approach, there should be at least a comment > > in the kickstart file explaining how the excluded font groups have been > > determined. > > The alternative is to still kick out ekiga (sorry, it's pretty large), > and find the rest of the space somewhere else. > Kicking the debuginfo out of mono-core should give us on the order of 15M, I think: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430500 But I am not opposed to do the font pruning. All I'm asking is that you add a comment explaining the rationale and where the data came from. -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
