On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 15:38 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matthias Clasen <mclasen <at> redhat.com> writes:
> > + switch from "generic name" style to "name - generic name" ?
>
> Yes, please! :-)
>
> Ideally that'd be implemented by using both the Name and GenericName fields of
++
> the .desktop file, but even putting "name - generic name" into Name would be a
> huge improvement over having just the generic name there (and require no
> changes to GNOME, whereas GenericName is currently not supported by GNOME).
That'd just generate a huge mess once tools (panel etc.) could cope with
Name + GenericName, wouldn't it? If all else fails, allow "Name=<name> -
<genericname>" only if GenericName is empty.
> > + "too much" - what to get rid of in the menus, and how
>
> IMHO all GUI apps really need to be in the menus. How else are users supposed
> to find them?
In principle yes, but if we talk about live media we can resort to:
what's not on the media isn't in the menu either.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
--
Fedora-desktop-list mailing list
Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
