On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 12:34 -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 18:26 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > I still believe the proper way to fix this is have some kind of
> > babysitter daemon that shares most of its code with the init
> > system. The problems for system startup and service management and for
> > session startup and service management are mostly the same. Both sides
> > would benefit if system and session startup/management would be
> > handled by the same powerful system.
>
> Indeed, but until that pie-in-the-blue-sky thing is available I think
> it's worthwhile to make this tiny enhancement (it would have been
> quicker to JFDI than entertaining a whole thread about it).
What is an enhancement in your scope would break things in other
people's scopes -- we would have had this discussion either way. By
discussing things first you at least escaped accusations of being part
of a "cabal" doing things "in the secret" and "shoving it down other
people's throats" ;-P.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
--
Fedora-desktop-list mailing list
Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
