On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 11:35 -0500, Colin Walters wrote: > On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 17:23 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 11:10 -0500, Colin Walters wrote: > > > On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 16:14 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote: > > > > > > > Not in the least, there are programs which are supposed to stay running > > > > even when you log out -- screen, vncserver, nohup'ed processes etc. > > > > > > No one is talking about changing the semantics of "nohup". > > > > Perhaps I'm a bit slow, but how would it not do this if it relies on the > > inheritance of a previously non-existent environment variable that needs > > to be deleted if a process shall not be killed on session exit? > > Oh I see, I was wrong; yes David was talking about automatically killing > all processes. That is wrong, I agree with you. > > As Havoc said, having them connect to X11 or DBus, or using a babysitter > that does is the right way. One problem here is that too many apps set exit-on-disconnect false with D-Bus to work around bugs in the stupid app where the app gets kicked off the bus for doing something bad. dan -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
