On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 23:11 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote: > Now what I really don't want to do is deal with service type transitions > (NMD gets stopped -> network-based services get normal SysVinit services > again) as I don't see real value behind it. If network-based services > need a daemon to run properly then it better ran. It's not really a new > situation -- if xinetd doesn't run, xinetd-based services don't get > started. Just as with every other basic building block of the system. > > Makes sense? As long as it will be able to support both traditional networking setups (for servers) and NM-based setups, it should be fine. I don't think going back and forth between these two at runtime is very interesting. -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
