On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 23:30 -0400, Gian Paolo Mureddu wrote: > Colin Walters escribió: > > On 8/16/07, *Gian Paolo Mureddu* <gmureddu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > <mailto:gmureddu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > > > > > fine, adding sudo by default doesn't seem like very good idea for me, > > especially after my experiences with *buntu systems where the whole > > */sbin paths are visible to the regular users, > > > > But what is a "regular" user? If you have the Vista/OSX desktop spin, > > "regular users" won't ever open a terminal (or really, any application > > other than a web browser), and so the default path is completely > > irrelevant. > > > > But as a developer, when I open a terminal I want ifconfig, damn it. > Then change your .bashrc to include /sbin in the PATH, don't do it > "universally" for all users and much less *enforce* insecure practices. > Besides as I said, many of the /sbin commands run as regular users, and > just like you I don't see the "burden" to use the full path... > /sbin/ifconfig... You're seriously suggesting that putting /usr/sbin and /sbin in the default path is insecure? - ajax -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
