On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 08:12 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On 8/2/07, Caolan McNamara <caolanm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Most companies have the luxury of a formal or informal big 7 or big 12 > > language policy, and e.g. Dzongkha and Irish can forget about being > > supported. I guess the ideal solution for something like fedora would be > > a set of regional cds, though I'm not enthusiastic about actually > > contributing constructively and doing the work :-) > > Are all the translations broken out into subpackages in sane way > across the distro? Or is there re-packaging work that needs to be done > to make it possible to respin regionally? > Are there any other major roadblocks to someone making a regional cd > right now using something like revisor? > > I think regional cds are the way to go, but I'm not sure its > appropriate to change policy in terms of how we handle translations > for the F8 timescale. I think we could probably > decide...soon-ish..that we want to go regional for F9, and start > prioritizing the work to get from here to there. That would also give > "us" some time to have solid discussions with the non-EN/US speakers > about jumping on board to help create the re-spins. Wouldn't you use the rpm mechanism to install a subset of languages for that ? -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
