On 8/2/07, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > For OO.o and KDE, they are split. For other packages, they are not. > Whether to split or not is a long, drawn-out conversation. (Basically, > you make building liveCDs easier at the cost of making all languages > Just Work much harder.) Is there a fundamental technology shift that we have to swallow? Or is it more a death by a thousand cuts if we go in and start package surgery? For crap that has a lot of translation coverage, then it becomes more important an issue. I'll rephrase the question, if we decided that a single package needed to have its translations split off.. is there a known set of things that need to be adjusted? And do we have an idea what the next largest package is that would add additional flexibility for regional cd creation? it's never easy...but is it too hard to do by F9? I think if we are serious about focusing, then livecds are the best vechicle we have to explore focused space, in a way that gives external community a chance to help define cool foci. And if we can get to the point where regional cds are possible, that will significantly add in our flexibility moving forward. -jef"Penalizing openoffice because it does have significant translation support is a little ass-backwards."spaleta -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
