On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 09:36 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 13:33:28 +0100 > Caolan McNamara <caolanm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Sure, if the non-translated bits are fundamentally overscale to fit on > > cd vs the other options, or its too slow to run from CD, or we hate it > > too much to want it, then that's fine. But if the reason boiled down > > to solely having all languages supported on the cd as a goal and apps > > are then picked that have less translation coverage due to space > > reasons then that strikes me as a bit of a fudge. > > I don't disagree. However it's a lot easier to say "we don't support > your language because there was no translation for it upstream" than to > say "we don't support your language because we didn't think it was > important enough to include on the media. Sorry.". > > Still, some thought could be put around having regional editions of the > live image that include a set of the languages for that region or some > other ideas such as that. It just takes somebody playing around with > it (: The good news is that the tools are relatively easy so that > those playing at home can try things out instead of waiting for > something to fall out of the Red Hat black box. > +1. A while back gnome made a gnome preview live cd. It was a version of the gnome using an ubuntu livecd. They did one for the various languages that wanted them - hitting most of the 'major' languages and then doing others on request. -sv -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
