Kristian Høgsberg (krh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > I fixed most of them, and filed a bug for urw-fonts, for which I'm not > in the acl. Are there other font packages pulling in chkfontpath? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245784 According to repoquery, the following require chkfontpath: fonts-KOI8-R-75dpi-0:1.0-9.1.1.noarch efont-unicode-bdf-0:0.4.2-6.1.fc6.noarch fonts-KOI8-R-100dpi-0:1.0-9.1.1.noarch fonts-ISO8859-2-0:1.0-17.1.noarch fonts-japanese-0:0.20061016-6.fc7.noarch fonts-korean-0:1.0.11-9.1.1.noarch fonts-x11-apl-0:4.20.2-19.fc8.x86_64 wqy-bitmap-fonts-0:0.8.1-6.fc8.noarch fonts-truetype-apl-0:4.20.2-19.fc8.x86_64 x3270-x11-0:3.3.4p7-5.fc6.x86_64 libdockapp-fonts-0:0.6.1-3.fc8.x86_64 fonts-ISO8859-2-100dpi-0:1.0-17.1.noarch grace-0:5.1.21-1.fc7.x86_64 urw-fonts-0:2.3-6.1.1.noarch fonts-chinese-0:3.03-4.fc7.noarch fonts-ISO8859-2-75dpi-0:1.0-17.1.noarch fonts-KOI8-R-0:1.0-9.1.1.noarch terminus-font-x11-0:4.20-5.fc6.noarch zvbi-fonts-0:0.2.25-1.fc8.x86_64 Bill -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
