On Saturday 12 May 2007 12:00:44 Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > So the obvious question would be; Are we going to move toward > NetworkManager? > > I agree that having multiple config stacks is bad, but the problem here > is choice (where did I hear that before?). As long as we're not forcing > the user / system admin to choose between s-c-n/NM, and/or service > network vs. NM, you'll have multiple config stacks. The problem may not > be solved by enabling upstream NM to take over s-c-n functionality and > stability and just force the use of NM over s-c-n, rather then just > letting (forcing) someone choose between the two configuration systems, > right? I personally don't have an answer for this. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpQg0iuYRwev.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
