On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 14:07 -0500, xiphmont@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> On 2/27/07, David Zeuthen <davidz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Rather, I should say the idea up for consideration is a thin
> > > authenticator that is the only trusted connection mechanism for a
> > > system pulse.
> >
> > Yea, that's sort of what I meant. The system-wide bit would just pass a
> > fd over a socket to the per-session pulse.
>
> Backwards.
How about posting a more detailed plan or replying to the one I posted
just before. And no manifestos in it this time either - we're not
terribly interested in why *you* think OSS is important to support since
it can be done by at least two mechanisms if you so desire. Thanks.
David
--
Fedora-desktop-list mailing list
Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
