David Zeuthen (davidz@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > The questions really just come down to which compromises we want to > > make. Well, that or we need to come up with magically better > > compression :) > > Yeah. This brings up one of my nagging concerns though - one of our main points is that we're trying to do a single usable Live CD. As the guy who used to do the Publishers Edition[1]... this is a losing game. We're always going to get more languages. Code tends to always get bigger. We're always going to get *more* functionality we'd like to include, not less. So, the usefulness of the LiveCD is actually going to *decrease* over time. Considering it's a large part of our F7 (and presumably future) plans, that worries me. Bill [1] In the days before LiveCDs, there was the Red Hat Linux 'Publisher's Edition' - a single installable CD that would contain a desktop, standard apps, and basic servers. Due to a) size constraints b) a lack of useful rel-eng tools, it was a pain in the ass to build -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list