On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 05:44:38PM -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureFedoraDesktop > > This is a first rough draft at what packages to include in the Desktop spin. > <core> (not visible) > hdparm Is this really vital for core? If a chipset isn't auto-enabling DMA these days, it's a kernel bug that really should be fixed. And I can't think of any other must-have reasons for hdparm. > <base> (visible) > crash belongs in a 'development' group or the like, but there doesn't seem to be one. Hmm? I'd put this wherever binutils/gdb/gcc are, which doesn't seem to be 'base'. > diskdumputils This should be dropped. The kernel bits haven't been present for some time now. > gnome-power-manager (does this go with Desktop instead?) I'd say yes today, given the absense of a system wide power daemon. > mcelog Should be core. This is as important as say, fsck. > mdadm When this list says 'visible' does that mean "offered as a choice in package set" ? Anaconda has the knowledge to know whether or not it will need this post-boot so this shouldn't need to be asked about. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
