Gian Paolo Mureddu (gmureddu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > Just to add my opinion. Thus far the selection of packages seem very > good, however may I suggest Beryl instead of Compiz? The reason why I > ask this is simple: performance. Beryl seems to be (quite a bit) faster > than Compiz. This has come up on fedora-devel - frankly, from my experience with such things as how beryl-settings is done, I can't really support using it anywhere by default. > Another program that I'd rather use and I 100% agree with its inclusion > is Banshee over Rhythmbox. Not that I don't like Rhythmbox, but rather > that Banshee uses Mono instead of Python, and in my (albeit personal) > tests, I've found that Mono is less of a resource hog than Python both > in memory fingerprint and CPU time, at least on x86_64, where in x86 > they both are pretty much the same (seems the memory fingerprint of > python on x86_64 is exaggerated quite a bit in regards to its i386 > version, more than twice the memory print... Maybe a leak?). 1) I wouldn't make languages a big deciding point 2) rhythmbox doesn't use that much python > It may only be me, but of the system-config* utilities, wouldn't it also > make sense to include system-config-display? Speaking of the > system-config utilities, how about these: system-config-display needs to die. > system-config-language Why not use the language setting in the DM? This only affects the console and the gdm default. > system-config-samba gnome-user-share? Bill -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
