Thilo Pfennig schrieb: > > I would like to take the chance to try to convince on a last attempt the > Fedora project to change its path. The problem starts if you try to find > the right list to post such an article. There seems to be no list for > discussing the Fedora project!? Well, there are to many lists these days and here it there is a bit chaos. This will probably cleaned up sooner or later (it was discussed on fedora-advisory-board slightly already). Someone just has to work out a scheme what to do, but nobody stepped up to work out something in detailed yet. > There are the more or less readonly or readprotected lists, Only fedora-advisory and fedora-maintainers have a readonly variants IIRC. Most other lists are open iirc. > there is a > general fedora-list, one for martketing,... - This list is the best > guess I could make although I assume desktop means desktop enviroment. > Anyway, I just want to post this now. fedora-devel would have been the better place probably. I'd suggest you send it there again. > My general criticism is that Fedora is not a real community project. > This can clearly be seen by the mailing list structure (as the future of > Fedora can not really be discussed by the users). Fedora has stated to > be a meritocracy ( > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAQ#head-b9eb81965c2ef7b97979c8b3a9ba587b52da43c9 > ). There is a system of Ambassadors. Different from Ubuntu one can say > that it is generally not wanted that users take the distribution into > their own hands and make their own marketing. Who is ambassador? > "Ambassadors program is a meritocracy, so the ones who have shown that > they are actively doing the right thing will be best candidates." There is work underdone to change this -- your were pointed to the Summit-Pages already. A lot will change and we can need any help with it. > [...] CU thl -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
