On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 21:26 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > David Zeuthen (davidz@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > Right. My understanding is that the controversial part of unionfs is the > > ability to join multiple writable file systems into a single tree. Is > > this correct? Just found the page here, http://www.am-utils.org/project-unionfs.html And yes, it appears it's designed to do a lot of things instead of just doing one thing really well. > Well, in my experience, all I tried was one readable + one writable, and > *that* blew up. So, my objection was that the basic case failed. I'm more curious how hard it can be given the assumptions I listed in my other mail. Then again, I'm not a kernel hacker and got too much on my plate already :-) David -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
