<subscriber only list removed from Cc> On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 08:31:48PM -0400, David Zeuthen wrote: > On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 20:20 -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 04:07:12PM -0400, David Zeuthen wrote: > > > > > Btw, If someone could talk davej into including unionfs into the Fedora > > > kernel, we'd use that instead of dm-snapshot and we'd have persistence > > > more easily solved [1]. > > > > I think the comments Al Viro had on it the last time it was reviewed > > were for the most part unprintable. I wouldn't hold your breath for > > this to appear any time soon. > > Right. My understanding is that the controversial part of unionfs is the > ability to join multiple writable file systems into a single tree. Is > this correct? tbh, since Al reviewed it unfavorably, I haven't even bothered looking at it, so I'm the wrong person to be asking. But ISTR there were a number of issues rather than one sticking point. Al would be a better person to ask about the gory details. Dave -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
