On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 00:31 +0200, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote: > On 9/20/06, David Zeuthen <davidz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Sure, I'm all for that and am hopeful to get contributors besides > > myself. Would have to review patches etc. on list since other projects > > such as OLPC depends on pilgrim. But that's no different from other open > > source projects. > > After reading all these mails :), i'll tend to say that pilgrim's yum > approach sounds great. Yum's new metaparser might play a great role as > well. However, anaconda provides kickstart file feature to kadischi > and this is greatly used by people in the fedora-livecd list. > > Sure, I'm not saying that kadischi has to adapt itself to pilgrim's > theory. But since, kadischi is only maintained for the moment by > Jasper and I at a very slow rate, it would be best to consider on what > > * what is Kadischi, by the Fedora Project > * which one should be a Fedora Live image Creator/Installer > * how both pilgrim and kadischi can benefit. > implementing a %packages in ks.cfg-style parser as a yum-util shouldn't be much work. Mostly just extracting the code from anaconda, I'd bet. -sv -- Fedora-desktop-list mailing list Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
