Re: [Usability] : First report of the Fedora Usability Sig

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Yeah, but if we make this, we should move all pages related to usability and by consequent, moved all pages of other sig

I'm not agree with you, for me the actuel location is not a problem.

Regars,

Damien

2006/8/27, Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Sun, 2006-08-27 at 17:05 +0200, Damien Durand wrote:
> The Usability Sig is not a Fedora Extras sig. The location is correct.

I disagree.  It should be under
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Usability instead of under
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Usability, which gives the impression that
it is an approved project, instead of a SIG.

/B
--
Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E


--
Fedora-desktop-list mailing list
Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list



-- 
Fedora-desktop-list mailing list
Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux