Re: GNOME Vs KDE upgradeability.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The original point of my discussion has been vindicated: There's yet
again, another KDE update with all its libs and all other programs to
3.5.1, and got me wondering, GNOME 2.12 should be almost 6 months now
and Fedora Core 4 never got an update for it, nor was there an update
for Fedora Core 3 to update from 2.8 to 2.10 once Core 4 was out as an
update. I know resources are limited, and yet KDE has had a major
version update, where GNOME has had none... What I find oddest about
this, is that Fedora is built around GNOME (or GTK+ at least) and
GNOME's even the default desktop, and yet the one with a major revamp
is KDE? Call me stupid, but I plainly don't understand this, and goes
beyond the fact I use GNOME over KDE, I'm sure a lot of KDE users and
fans in Fedora are quite happy with the updates, I just wonder why
this is not the case with the *default* DE... Seems odd.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD5O3WXM+XOp70dwoRAnzNAJ94gou+ncf9Zd/fJr6qh9cx0pqFTACfRbG8
pAGGjR655bFAYADZdQX66lE=
=dCdV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 

Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux