On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 18:37 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> I also idley wonder why Fedora sticks with system-config-* rather than
> gnome-system-tools and friends, given the push for upstream
> compatibilitiy, but that's another thread :).
I think, as discussed earlier on this list (and extensively on
desktop-devel-list@xxxxxxxxx), that neither system-config-* nor
gnome-system-tools (at least in earlier versions) is the right approach
regarding configuration of a desktop system or a laptop [1].
The problem, or bug, is that both of these normally requires the root
password and, to an extent, touches system-wide configuration.
So, what we want is ideally auto-configuration (thus no need for an
actual tool and no need to waste precious menu space), per-user
configuration (thin NetworkManager or gnome-power-manager) or something
third. Btw, there's lots of things that needs to get fixed; sound [2]
and video [3] are two examples comes to mind. Patches fixing things like
these are much welcome and should ideally be directed to upstream rather
than Fedora if possible.
Cheers,
David
[1] : Things like servers, e.g. httpd, is an entirely different problem
and I think most people agree that e.g. system-config-httpd isn't the
right approach either.
[2] : Bastien nicely summed up the work required here
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/utopia-list/2005-July/msg00001.html
[3] : E.g. dynamic reconfiguration of the X.org server
--
Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
