On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:01:31 -0500, Gain Paolo Mureddu wrote: > Yes, and this does not happen exclusively with Epiphany. It pretty much > happens when you have an icon "outside" the scope of your currently used > icon theme (I know 'cause I use a custom one). Even though many > applications icons are in place in my current theme, there's quite a bit > of them missing (like Amarok, for instance...) I found that I had to add > the inherited icon theme I wanted to use for some icons too (I'm > currently using a Mac-esque icon theme, and I had to inherit the > crystal icon theme too). I'm not sure I understand "inherit" in this context. I did say, I think, that the machine in question is one that I upgraded from FC1 to FC4 -- and should have said, if I didn't, that everything including the icon was normal before the upgrade. So I should have inherited -- if I understand aright. > Sure enough the panel would complaint about not having an icon available > for the launcher, that file was missing and such and such. I wonder why > is the file not being seen when it fells outside the scope of you > currently used icons theme, unless you inherit the icon (or link the > icon you want into your theme's expected directory, like > /usr/share/icons/Bluecurve/48x48/apps/). To judge from the error box I get, FC4 seems to expect it to be in /usr/share/icons/gnome rather than the one above, where it is. > At least there's a bugzilla now about it. Oh good. By yourself? Thank you for that. I can't seem to get my head around bugzilla for some reason .... -- Beartooth Neo-Redneck, Linux Evangelist FC4, YDL 4; Pine 4.63, Pan 0.14.2.91; Privoxy 3.0.3; Dillo 0.8.5, Opera 8.01, Firefox 1.0.4, Epiphany 1.6.1 Remember that I have little idea what I am talking about. -- Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
