Re: Do yum and up2date play nice? -- detail

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 15:37:49 -0500, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 21:16 +0100, Kyrre Ness Sjobak wrote:
> > a quick sumup:
> >
> > synaptic is a nice GUI for apt.
> >
> > up2date is only usefull to show pending updates
> >
> > yum is only usefull after fc2 (IMO), unless you are dealing with
> > multilib.
> >
> > So for fc<3, use apt. For fc>3, use yum. If x86_64, use yum.
> >
> > That is the simple explanation.
> 
> I disagree, of course, if you're looking for repositories you're going
> to have more luck finding yum repositories for FC-2.
> 
> -sv
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list
> 

Another difference: in synaptic you can browse for packages. AFAIK you
can't do that with yum.

Dotan Cohen
http://English-Lyrics.com
http://Song-Lyriks.com

-- 

Fedora-desktop-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-desktop-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux