On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 20:29, Alex Wallis wrote: > I was led to believe that to be considered for inclusion a suitable > window manager should provide both i18n/internationalisation AND > a11y/accessibility support. This certainly isn't necessary for inclusion in fedora extras, or even always a requirement for core. The point about i18n/a11y and other issues such as those at http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/desktop/defaults.html are really about selecting the defaults. > However, fvwm does provide the former, but > documentation on methods of including a11y support appears to be sparse, > so we are still investigating this. If anyone can provide some useful > url's on a11y we would be most grateful. The developer.gnome.org a11y pages are probably the best source of info. > It is our hope that perhaps once these adjustments have been made that > fvwm and fvwm-themes packages may be considered for inclusion into the > fedora extras trees. Please feel free to offer any suggestions that may > assist us in this endeavour. I'd say fvwm is an obvious and uncontroversial addition to fedora extras, and would be unlikely to appear in fedora core. Havoc
