On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 00:05, Jonathan C. Sitte wrote: > I think that would be a good thing to talk about on this list. Is the > GPL good for artwork? ;). Well, not really. The GPL pretty clearly talks about software and code in the license. There are other licenses that are more designed for text or artwork. However, sort of standard practice is to ship a bunch of images with programs and not put a separate license on the images. So I guess on some level you can just say the images are part of the software. There's a lot of prior discussion of this, if you google you could probably find a list of licenses people have come up with and discussion of same. Havoc
