fedora-config-list-request,您好！
Please send kernel-2.66 support 802.1q vlan for redhat fedora 2 setup step.
Note: connect link cisco4506 switch.
======= 2004-07-30 16:21:00 您在来信中写道：=======
>Send Fedora-config-list mailing list submissions to
> fedora-config-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-config-list
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> fedora-config-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> fedora-config-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of Fedora-config-list digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: system-config-securitylevel and named services (Jeremy Katz)
> 2. Re: system-config-securitylevel and named services (Jeremy Katz)
> 3. s-c-securitylevel for SeLinux not working right (Gregory Woodbury)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:37:02 -0400
>From: Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: system-config-securitylevel and named services
>To: Discussions about configuration tool development
> <fedora-config-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Message-ID: <1091126222.3823.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Content-Type: text/plain
>
>On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 05:35 -0400, Paul Nasrat wrote:
>> Would an add/remove rather than textbox for additional services make better
>> sense? In which case should we have a predefined list of more well known
>> services, with addition of custom ports (possibly with descriptive text or
>> just showing both port and service name from /etc/services).
>
>That's sort of the direction the anaconda screen has moved in. I
>haven't quite gone to the point of adding arbitrary ones, but it's not
>difficult to do.
>
>> I wonder if we will want to have better "service definition" for
>> service publishing via howl.
>
>Eventually, yes.
>
>Jeremy
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 14:38:22 -0400
>From: Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: system-config-securitylevel and named services
>To: Discussions about configuration tool development
> <fedora-config-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
>Message-ID: <1091126302.3823.8.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Content-Type: text/plain
>
>On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 08:26 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>> Would it make better sense to stuff this into firstboot to shorten the
>> number of installer screens? I'm not sure what the rule is in terms of
>> what goes into anaconda versus what goes into firstboot. Should
>> anaconda be concerned *only* with packages, while firstboot deals
>> strictly with post-install configuration (adding users, firewall, clock,
>> addition package sources (yum, up2date)? Might be the case that this is
>> a larger issue to be discussed at a later date.
>
>The place where this gets difficult is on arches like s390, s390x and
>iSeries where you don't really have a head to speak of and thus
>firstboot is a bit ugly to depend on. Not sure what the right direction
>for these arches is...
>
>Jeremy
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 3
>Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:16:17 -0400
>From: Gregory Woodbury <ggw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: s-c-securitylevel for SeLinux not working right
>To: fedora-config-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>Message-ID: <20040729221617.GA16317@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>I attempted to use system-config-securitylevel to adjust the iptables
>and SeLinux parameters for FC3t1 (rawhide) just a few moments ago and
>attempted to tune some of the parameters.
>
>First, it wanted the policy-source RPM installed, which in turn required
>checkpolicy RPM. The spec files need adjusting.
>
>Attempting to tune portmat to run without SeLinux protections resulted
>in an error traceback:
>
>---------------------------
>Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/share/system-config-securitylevel/securitylevel.py", line
>164, in okClicked
> rc = self.apply()
> File "/usr/share/system-config-securitylevel/securitylevel.py", line
>170, in apply
> self.selinuxPage.apply()
> File "/usr/share/system-config-securitylevel/selinuxPage.py", line
>411, in apply
> self.tunables[key].write()
> File "/usr/share/system-config-securitylevel/selinuxPage.py", line
>140, in write
> os.rename(outfile[1],self.filename)
>OSError: [Errno 18] Invalid cross-device link
>---------------------------
>
>
>What component should this be bugzilla'd against? or is posting here
>sufficient?
>
>--
>G.Wolfe Woodbury `- -'
> U
>The Line Eater is a boojum!
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>--
>Fedora-config-list mailing list
>Fedora-config-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-config-list
>
>
>End of Fedora-config-list Digest, Vol 5, Issue 17
>*************************************************
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
致
礼！
青岛干箱
财务信息部
陈聚云
jzcjy
jzcjy@xxxxxxxx
2004-07-31
--
Fedora-config-list mailing list
Fedora-config-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-config-list