On 03/07/17 11:36 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 02:25:45PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: >> Does it break GNOME if the original .png file *also* stays in place? >> That seems like a much less risky change because at this point we don't >> know for sure where all that file may be referenced already. > Ooh, also: the newer dawn, dusk, and night images as compared to 26.2.2 > are really ... harsh. Particularly, the white top layer fog doesn't > blend in very well. Is this intentional? I kind of like the "foggy > night" thing, but the brushstrokes seem a bit jarring. The older images > have this more toned down. It is unintentional. I have access to the source files and see if I can tone down the fog. Keeping the original .png file won't break GNOME. It is only a matter to assign it through xml file. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx W: http://www.coolest-storm.net _______________________________________________ design-team mailing list -- design-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to design-team-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
