Am 28.02.2017 um 23:37 schrieb Máirín Duffy:
On 02/24/2017 03:15 AM, Maria Leonova wrote:Hi Kyle, I think just trees without the wave look better now, and I would add more of them to create an illusion of a real forest, not random trees on the shore. Having done that it might work to incorporate the wave into the trees, and by that I mean make it appear and disappear with an illusion of interweaving and moving forward and through the forest. Once again - love the idea!I agree with Maria's feedback - I think I'd ditch the wave - we don't want to be *too* literal. That the trees are an actual sound wave is I think an elegant little trick, and I think adding the wave form in sort of loses the elegance / minimalism of it.
We can keep it, but as I said before not just running a blur on it. I suggested the use of a filter, see attachment. It works best if you add before some nodes to the path and then jitter it a bit, see under extensions paths. Then duplicate it with the filter and give it a bit of an offset
I worry more about the strange colors br gnokii btw. I would love the attached pics are not that huge 90MB for an svg?
~m _______________________________________________ design-team mailing list -- design-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to design-team-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
smoke_filter.svg
Description: image/svg
_______________________________________________ design-team mailing list -- design-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to design-team-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
