Máirín Duffy (duffy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > On 04/04/2013 10:33 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > ... especially since packagers aren't allowed to ship their own versions > > of any logos. > > My team and I are more than happy to discuss any new or modified usages > of the logo and produce appropriate artwork, getting it added to the > fedora-logos package as necessary, for any packager who has the need and > comes to us. I understand your desire to have input into how the logo is used. My point is that if the logos provided *as the only logos that software in Fedora can use* aren't suitable to use as is, it amounts to merely playing "GOTCHA!" with people who are trying to use the right thing that the design team has already provided them. If fedora-logos doesn't provide an actual version of the logomark that corresponds to the guidelines, it's not the fault of other groups for using the only version that's there. Bill _______________________________________________ design-team mailing list design-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team
