These look really good Alexander! I like the crowd image on the back, and the reflection on the front is really nice. wrt the lower right corner - I think the contrast provided by the lighter blue looks a good bit better, maybe we can play with some other way of differentiating between the kde and standard release? Also, the spacing of the logo(s) and the 14 seems a bit too far apart. I think if they're spaced closer together it'll look more cohesive. Also, on the standard release covers, it looks a bit redundant to have the fedora logo twice in such close proximity, so maybe we should remove the small top logo? > Also a question for everyone: > Do we really need to state the minimum requirements? 400MHz Pentium II > processors are over 11 years old. Surely any owners of such a computer > would, by now, know what it's likely to be able to run. Also, minimum > requirements confuse people. I've lost count of the number of times I've > been asked "Does this mean my computer's good enough?" Since the > necessary hardware is so basic, the answer for Fedora is almost > certainly "Yes", so why confuse anyone unnecessarily? I agree - I don't think the minimum requirements are very helpful. It's also not very clear what minimum requirements means - is it the minimum needed to boot or is it the minimum needed to be reasonably usable? It also doesn't address disk space requirements or minimum graphics needed. Personally I think we should just leave it off, as this is very old/basic hardware, and there are many people who won't even know what kind of hardware they're running or how to find out. The only exception may be indicating the requirement of a 64-bit processor for the 64-bit version (maybe with 'if you're not sure, use the 32-bit CD'). _______________________________________________ design-team mailing list design-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team
