On 09/10/2010 03:40 AM, Chris Jones wrote: > > Gnome-Shell: > > There's no doubt whether we like it or not, the Gnome-Shell will be > implemented as the replacement and default desktop environment for > Fedora including its Spin Desktops, somewhere along the line. > > Personally, I'm no fan of the Gnome-Shell (Gnome 3), hence my own > complete migration to the KDE4 desktop environment in the previous > weeks. > > I am curious as to how Gnome-Shell is going to affect the Spins? ie. > Design Suite Spin. > > Will it affect performance and productivity? > And how much control do we have in blocking it for a desktop spin? > And should we be blocking it? Gnome-Shell is part of GNOME 3 which was postponed (at least) until the next spring, so I expect our Design Suite to default to the classic panel in F14. > Inkscape desktop icon: > > I am not happy with the current process of having a Inkscape icon and > link on the desktop upon a fresh install of the Design Suite Spin. > > To me, it simply does not make sense and poses more questions that what > it answers. > > It's easy enough to remove using the kickstart config. But before I go > and do that, I require the opinions of others. -1 to having application icons on the desktop, they are in the menu and if the users want them on the desktop, it is trivial. -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com/ photography: http://photoblog.nicubunu.ro/ my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/ _______________________________________________ design-team mailing list design-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team
