On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 09:28:33AM +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote: > On 07/13/2010 12:54 AM, Cata wrote: > > These fonts, have accents? > > Some. For example Comfortaa and Cantarell has ăâî but it does not have > țș, Driod seems to have ș but still no ț. > Unfortunately MgOpen Modata is worse (nothing), Liberation Sans was > patched only recently and DejaVu is too generic. I saw this on the Cantarell site as well, which gave me pause: "Since the design was tested mainly when displayed on-screen at small sizes, the printed output (especially of the bold and oblique) does not work well. I hope to publish a final release that is tuned to the needs of printing in the future." If we're planning to use these fonts in printed material, should the printed output be a consideration? How does Cantarell fare in comparison with something like Droid Sans? -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com _______________________________________________ design-team mailing list design-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team
