On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 13:03 +0200, Nicu Buculei wrote: > On 02/17/2010 12:51 PM, Martin Sourada wrote: > > > > As for a very very quick look on the content -- why do we have OOo > > Impress but not the rest of the OOo suit (at least I haven't noticed it > > in menus)? This is IMHO just duplicating some of Inkscape functionality. > > We didn't get yet to the step of making a decision if we remove > duplicates or no. > > Probably the idea was Impress is design related, so it can fit the target. > > Even if it is a poor duplicate of Inkscape (if you are used to Inkscape, > Impress is *frustrating*) I think if the space allow we should leave it > there and even add the rest of OpenOffice.org (the core is already > there, the rest is small potatoes), because it enables the user (the > Designer) to to stuff with his work, for example create a slideshow or > an article for publishing. > > Sure, if the target is a single CD, then OOo should stay out completely, > no Impress, no nothing. > Actually, reading your comment, I've realized that after so much time without using OOo (about three years. I've been able to live with just TeX and Inkscape and occasional abiword or gnumeric usage) I've totally forgot that Impress is for creating presentations, not for drawing... So disregard my comment... But having the whole OOo would make better sense -- if I haven't missed something, we don't even have abiword there, which means we completely miss word processor on the spin... As far as space goes, something up to 1GB (not 1GiB!) would be perhaps best -- CD is too small and 1GB USB flash is the first bigger than that. Also I heard than lzma compression will be used in the future for compressing the spins, so we might actually gain some more free space. Martin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ design-team mailing list design-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team
