On 10/28/2009 11:33 AM, Martin Sourada wrote: > > I think the F12 schedule worked rather well, we slipped a few times a > few days or a week and skipped most of the wallpaper refreshes -- I > think it's unnecessary to have that many wallpaper refreshes. I've tried > to keep in sync with our work the Key milestones [1] so you can compare > what we did in time and when we did it. A characteristic of this cycle was we had some *very good* designs *very early* in the process, we got complacent about them and a long period of inactivity occurred (this is why I think we missed refreshes). Then close to the Beta we tried a refreshed look and post-beta due to *some* fedback, a major and unexpected refresh occurred. > If there's a calendar instance at our sites (I remember folks were > talking about it on infra, but don't know whether they implemented it), > it would nice to load the schedule there -- calendar with highlights is > faster to follow than table with dates and not everyone uses one > himself. For the last few releases we have a recurrent motif: some key decision makers stay silent for most of the development cycle and very late in the process complain and require a complete (or at least major) redesign. This is a serious bug in our process. -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ design-team mailing list design-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/design-team
