On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 04:50:49PM +0100, Luca Foppiano wrote: > On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 12:32 +0100, Samuele Storari wrote: > > [...] > > The Spray paint brushes I used comes from here: > > > > http://www.blog.spoongraphics.co.uk/freebies/free-hi-res-spraypaint-photoshop-brushes-set-one > > > > http://www.blog.spoongraphics.co.uk/freebies/free-hi-res-spraypaint-photoshop-brushes-set-two > > those brushes are released with this licence: > > http://blogspoon.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/freebies/terms-of-use.html > > I think it's ok to use it :) > > What do you think? IANAL, but that reads to me as if it has a non-commerical use clause. It first references that it is under the CC BY, which is on the "good license" list for Fedora: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses_3 ... but then the page goes on to specify: "You can NOT sell the resources directly for profit (eg. Selling the items on stock resource websites)" Note that the license called out first does not have any non-commercial use clauses: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/ ... but because they have the right to add additional clauses, and appear to have done so, it seems as if they made their redistribution require non-commercial use. Anyway, they encourage us to ask: http://www.blog.spoongraphics.co.uk/contact So you might want to get that clarified that they mean to add an additional non-commercial use clause. FWIW, the second clause about not copying the website makes sense to me. The website is a separate from the individual graphic elements, and might even have trademark restrictions, etc. This doesn't seem to put any clauses on the individual resources being licensed. - Karsten -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade, Community Gardener http://quaid.fedorapeople.org AD0E0C41
Attachment:
pgppa9iYxYRRM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
