On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 16:48 -0500, Máirín Duffy wrote: > Ian Weller wrote: > > However with the Grecian columns and stuff we need to be careful of not > > looking "ancient", as some might say, but instead looking functional, > > practical, etc. > > Yes definitely. Like if the columns are ruins, we don't want > to give off the message that Fedora is in ruins or something > like that. We want to highlight the positive aspects... eg > rather than posing Fedora as the column, if we've got say a > pretty columns-ruins landscape, pose fedora as the vines and > plants and nature growing on top of the the old columns (the > columns then become the establishment/proprietary software) > Then it becomes more, 'Fedora - making proprietary OSes > history' rather than 'Fedora is old broken crap!' :) > > ~m > Well, I think if the columns were not ruins [1](i.e. would be still standing and would not be broken, I think there are such in Greece even now) it would give much better message, like 'Fedora outlives its creators' or something like that (well, my example is a bit lame, I am not good with this stuff after all...). Martin Reference: [1] http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/51/Stoa_in_Athens.jpg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
