On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 09:00:15PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: >> Perhaps a few guidelines can keep submissions (and RPM sizes) down. We'd >> need to come up with those. Or, perhaps, some sort of voting scheme or >> committee, which would decide each individual image. >> >> > As nicu pointed out when I discussed it a little bit with him today on irc > that for example, who would be in that committee? > > Everyone on this list would want to contribute.... > Yeah, bad idea on my part. >> Or! a quota for how many images can be in each package. And instead of >> categorizing images, why not have the packages by month? For example, >> wallpaper extras decided by a certain date in December and on the >> mirrors in January. >> >> </idea_overflow> >> > First I would say we need a subject or a theme or something to focus on > for this months > photo/art project. It would gives something to focus on instead of > trying our selfs to come up with something. > Sounds good! Then have a new package of wallpapers per month? Perhaps ten or fifteen at a time? > Second it should be taken ( the photo ) or created during a certain time > period that again would put art lovers to create > up with create something new( instead of going into archives ). > I disagree with this. What if you already have (found) something excellent? No need to discriminate based on creation date. > Third it needs to be categorized for example. > > In the photo contest we have at work you are only allowed to enter > photos that has not been altered in any way other than > you may have "enhanced" colouring on the raw output of the photo, no > photoshop-ing or gimp-ing allowed. > > Then we have another category you can alter the original image as you > see fit through photoshop or gimp or other image editing program. > you can add others like the people that can create this stuff from > scratch ( I know I cant ) as in drawings, water paints oil paints 3d and > so fourth. > So, adaptations of original photos? Sounds like a nice idea. > </idea_overflow_continued> > Heh. -- Ian Weller <ianweller@xxxxxxxxx> http://ianweller.org GnuPG fingerprint: E51E 0517 7A92 70A2 4226 B050 87ED 7C97 EFA8 4A36 "Technology is a word that describes something that doesn't work yet." ~ Douglas Adams
Attachment:
pgpZWGq8RTyhl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
