On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 13:13 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Martin Sourada a écrit : > > Finally I'd like to throw some fuel for discussion (mainly on the > > art-list). We are a lot criticized for inconsistencies in the projection > > we use in echo. Strictly speaking we are using 3 different types of > > projections and we have rules which is used where and we are pretty much > > consistent with that. Especially we do not introduce any other different > > projections to these and thus trying to keep the set consistent. In that > > we are even better than gnome - I discovered a few of icons there that > > does not adhere to their projection guidelines and have their own > > (though usually only slightly different from the main types). > > > > But on the other side it turns out that having three main types of > > projections is too much for an icon set and that having two is about the > > right number. So I started discovering the idea a bit more [2] with the > > hope to come to some conclusions (in the future) about echo projection > > guidelines. I am thinking about creating a parallel icon set that would > > use echo guidelines sans the projection ones, but I have not yet decided > > on the used type of projections. > > > Quick comment, > > I remember having a discussion with Maírín about setting perspective for > 24x24 and less icons. Perhaps applying that illustrated perspectivs to > all categories at those sizes might help. Spherical icons will have much > impact. > Extra small icons (16x16) should stay flat due to their size. > > Luya 16x16 should be definitely flat, I am still considering whether 24x24 as well, but seeing how gnome handles that, probably not... Martin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
