On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 11:07 -0400, Jarod Wen wrote: > > May be a little nitpicky, but what's wrong with calling a machine made > > by Apple (regardless of whether it has a ppc, pcc64, or Intel chip) a > > PC? By every definition (other than Apple's marketing), it is a > > "personal computer" thereby qualifying it as a "PC". > > > Personally, I wish I could see on the sleeve that my mac can use it. > Of course, I admitted that when I was a newbie in Linux, I was rather > confused by the name of i386/586/686... Maybe a simple mark, saying 32- > bit or 64-bit, will be better? Or we just mention the 64-bit CD/DVD > separately but none on CD? That's what I was driving at -- we shouldn't need to point out 32-bit since it won't be helpful to most people who don't know the difference. We can call out 64-bit specifically if desired, for the exact opposite reason. > > I really like these, however, I'd also like to drive any potential > > contributors to join.fedoraproject.org on the back of the sleeve. I > > think that we did that with F9 to great effect. Comments, criticisms > > or flames? :) > > > I noticed that in the final printable sleeves for Fedora 9 > "fedoraproject.org" has been changed to "join.fedoraproject.org". > Maybe it is a good idea to follow this way, isn't it? Yes, see the separate thread on the fifth draft (:-D) for details. The big link should be join.fedoraproject.org. I don't think it's a problem if we have the "help.fedoraproject.org" link contained in the smaller instructions section. We just want to make sure it's *not* as noticeable as join.fp.o. -- Paul W. Frields gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://paul.frields.org/ - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
