On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 17:16 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote: > > No. We are talking about avatars, the statement told by an avatar is > "this is *me*". Avatars represent people and they should fit a number of > person types. True, but packaged in a distro, avatar "could" equate to icon, which is clearly done. > > > 2: Give users an artistic experience, with provisos. > > a) It doesn't distract them > > b) They understand it, without the need for a written explanation. > > Nope. An avatar is supposed to stand-out, to help you recognize your > personality from a bung of people (your login in the face browser, your > account in the user switcher, etc.) Correct, but you are not going to use one, that confuses, or have no idea as to meaning\representaion. Frank
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
