Máirín Duffy wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Max Spevack wrote:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Máirín Duffy wrote:
I think the one with the pru in it (design #1) is better. You could
consider it final I think. The only concern is that it's derived
from a Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0 Generic photo. Is that okay? If
not I can probably go out and shoot some photos of the skyline and
redo this weekend.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/
So we're not going to sell the shirts and admission to FUDCon is
free, which means that it's not "commercial".
Well the "non-commercial" clause in the CC licenses are problematic
for various reasons including the issue of defining what exactly is
considered commercial activity. I think using a different picture that
allows commercial activity is better.
but it is just a tshirt right? and they're not going to be sold...
I understand that but the license clauses might not and when there is
ambiguity, licensee intend matters a lot which we do not know about.
I can ask the photographer?
Ironically that was one of those CC licenses was meant to avoid but go
ahead. If we get a explicit permission, that is always safer. Thanks.
Rahul
_______________________________________________
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
