On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 09:23 +0200, Nicu Buculei wrote: > I am also *for* a blue alternative (at least as a try) but I find your > version a bit too bright. Maybe I'll try myself a darker version. > I noticed you attached the darker version to the Waves page [1]. I decided to give it another try and created a version that is neither that light like the first tries nor that dark like your try. I attached it to the page [1]. As for the issue of being it blue, well, I don't like very much the idea of having different colour wallpaper than blue, not only because I like blue (the Mo's grey/yellow sulphuric designs are great even though they are NOT blue), but mostly because I, and many other people, have Fedora already associated with blue. Yeah, we can experiment with other colours as well, but as far as we don't want to confuse people we need blue to be the main colour. Now when you look at fedora wallpapers, you most likely guess it's fedora, if we will have grey wallpaper nobody would guess it's fedora... But anyway, if more people prefer grey, I am not against it ;-) So the main question is: do we want the default colour to be part of fedora "image" or not? If the former, than we have to have blue wallpapers, if the latter, we can have in each release different coloured one... Thanks, Martin References: [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/F9Themes/Waves
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
