-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Rogue <roguexz <at> gmail.com> writes: >> Jakub, you are comparing how the widget looks in Firefox 3 alone. What >> about other browsers? What if the native widgets in those other browsers >> look terrible? > > The main 2 browser engines in Fedora are: > * Gecko - for everything using this, the widgets will look just as in Firefox 3 > (from Fedora 9 on), > * KHTML (Konqueror) - ignores the widget styling entirely, so it's actually > already displaying a native widget, > so what browsers exactly are you worrying about? By other browsers, I mean, Opera 9+, Safari and IE too. Now I know that Safari / IE support sounds ridiculous, but consider a user running these applications and browsing our website? To give you an instance, I sometimes access my mails over the iPhone, which means I am using a Apple Mail + Safari combination. I would personally appreciate it if the site /behaved/ the same. Now the definition of behavior can be left to the site designers - some may choose to include L&Fs, others may choose to restrict it to only functionality. The point is that there are possibilities of indirect accesses of our site. Regarding the non-gecko Fedora-packaged HTML engines, I believe we should be filling bug reports against them for not supporting the standards :-) > > Also, I don't think the native widget can look worse than a simple > rectangle. ;-) Definitely :-) - -Rogue -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHd8B7ceS9IQvx51YRAlzlAJ4zL8Z5z3dY5ubfCdqleyIlqxpd0QCdGnVD sxbCvaa6Zv1HlX92EabBGeM= =Ewgf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
