tor, 22 11 2007 kl. 19:00 +0530, skrev Rahul Sundaram: > David Nielsen wrote: > > > Okay since you seem to think I rant I'll do an itemed list, sound good? > > Not really, no. What is required is for someone to file issues in a > place where it can be tracked like bugzilla or trac and possibly > contribute towards fixing those problems. You didn't read my mail, in which I specifically said that I assumed this was the artwork teams task, since it appears to not be - then I'll do it. > > 1) From previous debates on the list, Echo specifically does not target > > being accessible - that is perfectly okay but it makes it a less > > appealing choice as the new default. > > I think you are misinterpreting something. I don't think anyone ever > suggested that being accessible is not a concern for Echo. Only when I brought it up over a year ago in this thread: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-art-list/2006-August/msg00010.html The replies as to why Echo did not has a good coverage or a11y capabilities as Tango.. time, it took Tango a year. Then the replies turned into "go away". Well Echo has had more than a year and we are still no closer to addressing the fundamental issue that outlines are not good, the prespective stuff is used at far to small an icon size and there's an overabundance of detail at the small sizes. What conclusion am I supposed to draw?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dette er en digitalt underskrevet brevdel
_______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
