tor, 22 11 2007 kl. 00:37 +0100, skrev Martin Sourada: > On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 23:40 +0100, David Nielsen wrote: > > [1] http://www.vischeck.com/vischeck/ > > Thanks for the link, > > to have some material to talk about, I've taken some of the newer Echo > icons (all the 'category' icons [1] are done that way, and more or less > finished) and run through the filters. I don't see any big issues with > them, what do you think? I attach the original, plus the processed > images, that are sadly saved in jpeg which does not give the best > results... Generally, iso prespective make the icons look smaller, please remember that at this size both detail level and shape affects how easily you can utilize the brains wonderful pattern recognition abilities. I would strip the detail level down as much as possible and go for head on prespective. I would wager that the icons we display most often would be menu ones so they really deserve that extra attention and love. Another consideration with regards to prespective is that orientation matters in preception of size, twisted left seems smaller than twisted right because you appear to show off less surface area. The human brain is a strange beast. Add/Remove Software is very good, easy to spot, good shape use, colors work well across the colorblindness spectrum and it's head on prespective. A really good icon. The graphics icon is very hard to make out. I cannot I have to admit figure out what the office icon is suppose to look like, it does however seem to get better when the colorblindness filters are applied. Also notice how well the shape works for recognition for the games icon, low level of detail - despite even appearing small due to the iso prespective usage. It's also the only one to have a defined outline which really helps make the icon appear crisp and easy to recognize. This makes it work really well in every filter applied and I can make it out without my glasses on even from around 1m away. Where sexy and usable clashes is really the prespective, don't do iso unless at desktop icon size or above, you can candy it up with detail as size increases. Jimmac has a great article on his blog regarding the problems surrounding sizes and scaling icons[1]. [1] http://jimmac.musichall.cz/log/?p=177
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dette er en digitalt underskrevet brevdel
_______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
