Re: Do we need another Echo?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for the thoughtful responses.

I thought it might be worth re-evaluating the original purposes for Echo now that Diana is gone, and Tango is a bit more mature.

Of course, if people want to dedicate their time to the project, that is their prerogative and I don't want to be too negative about that.

Oh, and yet, Oxygen is a KDE project, but a nice icon style is a nice icon style :-)

Cheers,
Steven Garrity

Nicu Buculei wrote:
Steven Garrity wrote:
With Diana gone from the project, perhaps it is worth reconsidering the original goals of Echo.

With both Tango and Oxygen going, I see two strong projects with attractive and modern icon styles. I'd rather see Fedora team up with one of these projects than start anew (with isometric icons at that).

Thoughts?

Luya and Martin took over Echo, so is up to them to define their current set of goals. Echo development is not a blocker for Fedora, it goes in parallel and if/when the set become good enough we can evaluate it use as a default.

Echo was indeed started by Diana as a personal project, but at the time a lot more people were against using Tango as a default.
And Oxygen is not for KDE?


_______________________________________________
Fedora-art-list mailing list
Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Development]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Directory]     [PAM]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux