Le mercredi 28 mars 2007 à 19:57 +0100, Ben Arnold a écrit : > On 28/03/07, Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I don't like the way these tools are used for setup, properties and devel. > > A metaphor that is re-used for widely different things is not a good > > metaphor. > > +1 > > I think a different image should be used; KDE's Crystal developent > icon [a1] is a bit bland compared to Echo's style but the mimetype > icon for Kig [a2] looks good for development. I can see where you are > coming from looking at Bluecurve's package-development but I think we > can do better than that. > > I propose a 'screen designer' style icon; perhaps the following ideas may help: > - the screen behind a pencil and set square (similar to accessories) > - screen behind the 'applications-other' icon or similar > - screen with text or code on it, keyboard or pencil in front - > reminiscent to 'text-x-script' > - keyboard, pencil, cogs lego-style assembling (recognising software development these days involves creating new things with existing blocks, and avoiding confusion with schema/vector-graphics editors) -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
_______________________________________________ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
