"Joachim Frieben" <jfrieben@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > When I look at the current "Echo" icon pack, I'd say that all three > subdirectories "22x22", "24x24", "48x48" contain the same set of icons, > albeit at different scales. This invalidates your argument, sorry .. > I packaged those icons. What Diana put on line were just 86 icons svg and 48x48. The smaller sized icons were copied and resized from 48x48. I know they look awfully bad at 16x16 that's why 16x16 is not included. >> These smaller icons are 'simplified' versions of their larger brothers >> and sisters since in so few pixels its very hard to convey so much >> graphical information, and as you pointed out, when you try to convey >> so much information in just a few pixels, it just becomes kind of a >> paint blob.. hence the column 'Small' at >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/BluecurveAndBeyond/Gallery Not >> filled in yet, but i presume that this column will be filled-in in time >> with the smaller simplified versions of the icons, which don't turn >> into 'paint blobs' in 22x22 pixels.. even perspective might sometimes >> be 'flat' in the smaller icons to, as you point out, have max visual >> information room in such a small area. > -- Leon _______________________________________________ @xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/
